Get inspired by the success stories of our students in IIT JAM 2021. Learn More 

July 12, 2020

ISI MStat PSB 2014 Problem 2 | Properties of a Function

This is a very beautiful sample problem from ISI MStat PSB 2014 Problem 2 based on the use and properties of a function . Let's give it a try !!

Problem- ISI MStat PSB 2014 Problem 2

Let \( a_{1}<a_{2}<\cdots<a_{m}\) and \(b_{1}<b_{2}<\cdots<b_{n}\) be real numbers such
that \(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|a_{i}-x\right|=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\left|b_{j}-x\right| \text { for all } x \in \mathbb{R} \)
Show that \(m=n\) and \(a_{j}=b_{j}\) for \(1 \leq j \leq n\)



Mod function


Solution :

Let , \(\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|a_{i}-x\right|=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\left|b_{j}-x\right|=f(x) \text { for all } x \in \mathbb{R} \)

Then , \( f(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|a_{i}-x\right| \) is not differentiable at \( x=a_1,a_2, \cdots , a_m \) ---(1)

As we know the function \(|x-a_i|\) is not differentiable at \(x=a_i\) .

Again we have , \( f(x) = \sum_{j=1}^{n}\left|b_{j}-x\right| \) it also not differentiable at \( x= b_1,b_2, \cdots , b_n \) ----(2)

Hence from (1) we get f has m non-differentiable points and from (2) we get f has n non-differentiable points , which is possible only when m and n are equal .

And also the points where f is not differentiable must be same in both (1) and (2) .

As we have the restriction that \( a_{1}<a_{2}<\cdots<a_{m}\) and \(b_{1}<b_{2}<\cdots<b_{n}\) .

So , we have \(a_{j}=b_{j}\) for \(1 \leq j \leq n\) .

Food For Thought

\(a<b \in \mathbb{R} .\) Let \(f:[a, b] \rightarrow[a, b]\) be a continuous and differentiable on (a,b) . Suppose that \(\left|f^{\prime}(x)\right| \leq \alpha<1\) for all \(x \in(a, b)\) for some \(\alpha .\) Then prove that there exists unique \(x \in[a, b]\) such that \(f(x)=x\)

ISI MStat PSB 2008 Problem 10
Outstanding Statistics Program with Applications

Outstanding Statistics Program with Applications

Subscribe to Cheenta at Youtube

One comment on “ISI MStat PSB 2014 Problem 2 | Properties of a Function”

  1. This problem has an absolutely elementary solution. For any $x < \min (a_1, b_1)$, the given condition implies that:
    \[\sum_{i=1}^m a_i - mx= \sum_{j=1}^n b_j - nx.\]
    \[(m-n)x= \sum_{i=1}^m a_i - \sum_{j=1}^n b_j.\]

    If $m\neq n$, this linear equation has only one solution. But the above equation should be valid for any of the infinitely many $x<\min (a_1, b_1)$. Hence we must have $m=n$ and $\sum_{i=1}^na_i =\sum_{i=1}^n b_i$.\\
    Next, if $a_1 \neq b_1$, assume $a_1 < b_1$, and choose $x$ such that $a_1<x< \min(a_2, b_1)$. The given condition implies that

    \[x-a_1 + \sum_{i=2}^m a_i - (m-1)x = \sum_{i=1}^nb_i -nx.\]

    This, coupled with the previous result, implies that $x=a_1$, which is a contradiction. Hence we have $a_1=b_1$. Proceeding similarly, it follows that $a_i=b_i, \forall 1\leq i \leq n$.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Cheenta. Passion for Mathematics

Advanced Mathematical Science. Taught by olympians, researchers and true masters of the subject.